<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>ZFS on Kenno&#39;s Open Note</title>
    <link>https://blog.khmersite.net/categories/zfs/</link>
    <description>Recent content in ZFS on Kenno&#39;s Open Note</description>
    
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.154.0</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2020 22:52:58 +1100</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blog.khmersite.net/categories/zfs/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Using ZFS on an External Drive</title>
      <link>https://blog.khmersite.net/p/using-zfs-on-external-drive/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2020 22:52:58 +1100</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.khmersite.net/p/using-zfs-on-external-drive/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;rsquo;m a fan of ZFS filesystem. It&amp;rsquo;s so good that I also use ZFS on most my Linux machines, though it&amp;rsquo;s painful at time when the ZFS kernel modules fail to compile. Why I like it so much comparing to other file system such as XFS, EXT4, BTRFS? ZFS allows me to quickly do snapshots and efficiently send snapshots over the network, and my nas runs FreeBSD which support ZFS natively.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
